Several tests and assessments can be used to determine the overall personality type and dynamics of a group, such as an executive team. These assessments help in understanding the collective behavior, strengths, weaknesses, and potential areas for improvement within the team. Here are some of the most common and effective group personality assessments:

1. Team Role Assessments (Belbin Team Roles)

  • Focus: Identifies the specific roles individuals play in a team setting.
  • Methodology: Participants complete questionnaires that assess their behavior in team situations, identifying nine team roles such as Plant, Resource Investigator, Coordinator, Shaper, Monitor Evaluator, Teamworker, Implementer, Completer Finisher, and Specialist.
  • Application: Used to build balanced teams, improve team performance, and resolve conflicts.

2. DiSC Team Assessments

  • Focus: Uses the DiSC model to analyze team dynamics.
  • Methodology: Individual DiSC profiles are aggregated to provide a team report, highlighting the dominant styles within the team and how they interact.
  • Application: Enhances understanding of team members’ behavioral styles, improves communication, and fosters collaboration.

3. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Team Assessments

  • Focus: Uses MBTI to understand team personality dynamics.
  • Methodology: Individual MBTI results are compiled to provide insights into the team’s overall personality composition, identifying strengths, potential blind spots, and areas for growth.
  • Application: Facilitates team building, enhances communication, and aligns team efforts with organizational goals.

4. Big 5 (OCEAN) Personality Test for Teams

  • Focus: Measures the five broad dimensions of personality (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism).
  • Methodology: Aggregates individual Big 5 results to analyze the overall team personality.
  • Application: Used in academic research and organizational development to understand team traits and improve teamwork.

5. StrengthsFinder (CliftonStrengths) for Teams

  • Focus: Identifies individual strengths and how they contribute to the team.
  • Methodology: Participants complete the StrengthsFinder assessment to identify their top strengths, which are then mapped to understand the team’s collective strengths.
  • Application: Enhances team performance by leveraging individual strengths and addressing gaps.

6. Five Behaviors of a Cohesive Team (Patrick Lencioni)

  • Focus: Assesses team dynamics based on the Five Dysfunctions of a Team model.
  • Methodology: Teams complete an assessment that measures trust, conflict, commitment, accountability, and results.
  • Application: Used to improve team cohesion, productivity, and overall performance.

7. TetraMap

  • Focus: Uses a nature-based model to understand individual and team behavior.
  • Methodology: Participants are categorized into four elements (Earth, Air, Water, Fire) representing different behavioral styles.
  • Application: Enhances team communication, problem-solving, and collaboration.

8. Hogan Team Report

  • Focus: Analyzes team dynamics based on Hogan’s personality assessments (Hogan Personality Inventory, Hogan Development Survey, Motives, Values, Preferences Inventory).
  • Methodology: Aggregates individual Hogan assessment results to provide a comprehensive team report.
  • Application: Identifies team strengths, potential derailers, and alignment with organizational values.

9. Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument (TKI)

  • Focus: Assesses conflict resolution styles within a team.
  • Methodology: Participants complete the TKI assessment to identify their preferred conflict-handling styles (Competing, Collaborating, Compromising, Avoiding, Accommodating).
  • Application: Improves conflict resolution, enhances team collaboration, and fosters a positive team environment.

10. Team Emotional Intelligence (Team EQ)

  • Focus: Measures the collective emotional intelligence of a team.
  • Methodology: Assesses team members’ emotional awareness, regulation, and social skills.
  • Application: Enhances team cohesion, communication, and overall emotional climate.

These assessments provide valuable insights into team dynamics, helping to build stronger, more effective teams by understanding and leveraging individual and collective strengths and addressing areas for improvement..

Group Personality Tests in Comparison

Below a comparison of the various group personality assessments, ordered by their relevance to the Integrity Solutions Test, and including their relevance to the principles presented in “The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization” by Peter M. Senge:

Image of various Group Personality Tests

1. DiSC Team Assessments

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: High

  • Similarity: Both use behavior style categorizations to improve interpersonal communication and team dynamics. DiSC’s focus on behavior styles aligns well with the Integrity Solutions’ emphasis on understanding and aligning personal behavior with ethical standards.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: High
    • Systems Thinking: DiSC helps understand the interrelations of different behavior styles within a team, promoting a holistic view.
    • Personal Mastery: Encourages self-awareness and personal growth.
    • Mental Models: Helps challenge and refine individuals’ perceptions of others.
    • Building Shared Vision: Enhances alignment and collaboration.
    • Team Learning: Improves team dynamics and collective problem-solving.

2. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Team Assessments

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Moderate to High

  • Similarity: MBTI’s focus on intrinsic personality traits complements Integrity Solutions’ emphasis on behavior, enhancing overall self-awareness and communication.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: High
    • Systems Thinking: Provides insights into the diverse perspectives within a team.
    • Personal Mastery: Supports individual self-awareness and development.
    • Mental Models: Encourages the examination and understanding of different personality types.
    • Building Shared Vision: Facilitates a deeper understanding of team members, aiding in creating a cohesive vision.
    • Team Learning: Enhances communication and cooperation.

3. Five Behaviors of a Cohesive Team (Patrick Lencioni)

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Moderate to High

  • Similarity: Both emphasize trust, accountability, and ethical behavior within teams.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: High
    • Systems Thinking: Addresses team dynamics and their impact on organizational performance.
    • Personal Mastery: Encourages individual accountability and growth.
    • Mental Models: Helps teams identify and overcome dysfunctional behavior patterns.
    • Building Shared Vision: Promotes alignment and commitment to common goals.
    • Team Learning: Enhances overall team effectiveness and cooperation.

4. StrengthsFinder (CliftonStrengths) for Teams

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Moderate

  • Similarity: Focuses on identifying and leveraging individual strengths, which can complement the Integrity Solutions’ behavior styles by enhancing self-awareness and team collaboration.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Moderate to High
    • Systems Thinking: Encourages understanding and leveraging diverse strengths within a team.
    • Personal Mastery: Supports the development of individual strengths.
    • Mental Models: Helps individuals recognize and value different strengths.
    • Building Shared Vision: Promotes a strengths-based approach to achieving team goals.
    • Team Learning: Enhances teamwork by leveraging individual strengths.

5. Team Role Assessments (Belbin Team Roles)

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Moderate

  • Similarity: Both assess individual roles and behavior within a team to improve collaboration and performance.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Moderate
    • Systems Thinking: Provides insights into team dynamics and individual contributions.
    • Personal Mastery: Encourages self-awareness of one’s role in the team.
    • Mental Models: Helps identify and value different team roles.
    • Building Shared Vision: Facilitates alignment of team roles with organizational goals.
    • Team Learning: Enhances understanding of team dynamics.

6. Big 5 Personality Test for Teams

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Moderate

  • Similarity: Assesses broad personality traits, complementing the more specific behavior styles of Integrity Solutions.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Moderate
    • Systems Thinking: Provides a broad understanding of team personality dynamics.
    • Personal Mastery: Supports self-awareness and personal development.
    • Mental Models: Encourages understanding of diverse personality traits.
    • Building Shared Vision: Helps align team efforts by understanding personality dynamics.
    • Team Learning: Enhances team collaboration and communication.

7. HEXACO Personality Inventory

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Moderate

  • Similarity: Includes a dimension of honesty-humility, aligning with Integrity Solutions’ emphasis on ethical behavior.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Moderate
    • Systems Thinking: Provides insights into the broader personality traits affecting team dynamics.
    • Personal Mastery: Encourages self-awareness.
    • Mental Models: Helps understand the impact of personality traits on behavior.
    • Building Shared Vision: Facilitates alignment through understanding diverse traits.
    • Team Learning: Enhances team interaction and effectiveness.

8. Berkeley Emotional Intelligence Quiz

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Low to Moderate

  • Similarity: Focuses on emotional intelligence, which can complement the behavioral focus of Integrity Solutions by enhancing interpersonal skills.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Moderate
    • Systems Thinking: Enhances understanding of emotional dynamics within a team.
    • Personal Mastery: Supports emotional self-awareness and regulation.
    • Mental Models: Encourages empathy and understanding of others’ emotions.
    • Building Shared Vision: Facilitates collaboration through emotional intelligence.
    • Team Learning: Enhances communication and conflict resolution.

9. TetraMap

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Low

  • Similarity: Uses a nature-based model to understand behavior, which is less directly aligned with the professional and ethical focus of Integrity Solutions.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Moderate
    • Systems Thinking: Provides a holistic view of team behavior.
    • Personal Mastery: Encourages self-awareness through nature-based elements.
    • Mental Models: Helps understand diverse behavioral styles.
    • Building Shared Vision: Promotes alignment through understanding different styles.
    • Team Learning: Enhances collaboration by valuing diverse perspectives.

10. “Who Am I” Visual DNA Test

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Low

  • Similarity: Uses visual stimuli to assess personality, which is less structured and less directly applicable to professional settings compared to Integrity Solutions.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Low
    • Systems Thinking: Provides limited insights into team dynamics.
    • Personal Mastery: Offers some self-awareness but less practical application.
    • Mental Models: Encourages reflection but in a less structured manner.
    • Building Shared Vision: Limited applicability.
    • Team Learning: Less focused on professional team dynamics.

11. Personality Color Test

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Low

  • Similarity: Uses color preferences to determine personality traits, which is more informal and less structured than Integrity Solutions.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Low
    • Systems Thinking: Limited applicability.
    • Personal Mastery: Offers basic self-awareness.
    • Mental Models: Encourages understanding through color associations.
    • Building Shared Vision: Limited applicability.
    • Team Learning: Less structured approach to team dynamics.

12. Predictive Index Cognitive Assessment

Relevance to Integrity Solutions: Very Low

  • Similarity: Focuses on cognitive abilities rather than behavior styles or ethical behavior.
  • Relevance to “The Fifth Discipline”: Low
    • Systems Thinking: Focuses on individual cognitive abilities rather than team dynamics.
    • Personal Mastery: Limited to cognitive skills.
    • Mental Models: Limited applicability.
    • Building Shared Vision: Not directly applicable.
    • Team Learning: Less focused on team dynamics and behavior.

Summary:

  • Most Relevant to Integrity Solutions and “The Fifth Discipline”: DiSC Team Assessments
  • Moderately Relevant: MBTI, Five Behaviors of a Cohesive Team, StrengthsFinder, Team Role Assessments, Big 5, HEXACO
  • Less Relevant: Berkeley Emotional Intelligence Quiz, TetraMap, “Who Am I” Visual DNA Test, Personality Color Test
  • Least Relevant: Predictive Index Cognitive Assessment

These assessments provide valuable insights into team dynamics, behavior styles, and personality traits, complementing the principles of ethical behavior and continuous learning emphasized by Integrity Solutions and “The Fifth Discipline.”

Individual Personality Tests in Comparison

Various Individual Personality Tests

Let’s compare the Integrity Solutions Behavior Style Assessments with various other personality and cognitive assessments. We’ll start with the test most similar to Integrity Solutions and move to the least similar:

1. DiSC Personality Test

Similarity: High

  • Focus: Both tests categorize behavior styles and focus on interpersonal communication.
  • Methodology: DiSC assesses behavior into four primary types: Dominance, Influence, Steadiness, and Conscientiousness, similar to the Integrity Solutions’ Analytical, Driver, Amiable, Expressive styles.
  • Application: Used in professional settings for improving communication, team dynamics, and leadership, similar to Integrity Solutions.
  • Difference: DiSC does not emphasize ethical behavior and integrity as strongly as Integrity Solutions.

2. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Personality Test

Similarity: Moderate to High

  • Focus: MBTI categorizes personality into 16 types based on preferences in perception and judgment.
  • Methodology: Uses four dichotomies (e.g., Introversion/Extraversion, Sensing/Intuition).
  • Application: Used for personal development, career counseling, and team building.
  • Difference: MBTI focuses more on intrinsic personality traits rather than specific behaviors and does not explicitly integrate ethical standards.

3. Enneagram Personality Test

Similarity: Moderate

  • Focus: Identifies nine personality types based on motivations, fears, and behaviors.
  • Methodology: Explores deeper motivations behind behaviors.
  • Application: Personal development, spiritual growth, and improving relationships.
  • Difference: Emphasizes motivations and personal growth over professional behavior and ethical standards.

4. HIGH5 Test

Similarity: Moderate

  • Focus: Identifies individual strengths to enhance personal and professional life.
  • Methodology: Strengths-based assessment identifying five key strengths.
  • Application: Personal development, career guidance, team building.
  • Difference: Focuses on strengths rather than behavior styles and does not emphasize ethics as much as Integrity Solutions.

5. Big 5 Personality Test

Similarity: Moderate

  • Focus: Measures five broad dimensions of personality: Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Neuroticism.
  • Methodology: Based on factor analysis of personality traits.
  • Application: Academic research, personal development, and professional settings.
  • Difference: Emphasizes broad personality traits over specific behavior styles and ethical behavior.

6. HEXACO Personality Inventory

Similarity: Moderate

  • Focus: Similar to Big 5 but includes a sixth dimension: Honesty-Humility.
  • Methodology: Measures six dimensions: Honesty-Humility, Emotionality, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Openness to Experience.
  • Application: Academic research, personal development.
  • Difference: Broader trait focus and inclusion of honesty, but less practical application in professional settings compared to Integrity Solutions.

7. Berkeley Emotional Intelligence Quiz

Similarity: Low to Moderate

  • Focus: Measures emotional intelligence, including recognition and regulation of emotions.
  • Methodology: Uses scenarios to assess emotional intelligence skills.
  • Application: Personal development, leadership training.
  • Difference: Focuses on emotional intelligence rather than behavior styles or ethical behavior.

8. “Who Am I” Visual DNA Test

Similarity: Low

  • Focus: Visual-based assessment providing a snapshot of personality traits and preferences.
  • Methodology: Uses images to elicit responses and determine personality traits.
  • Application: Personal insights, fun and engaging self-discovery.
  • Difference: Less formal and scientific, more focused on visual stimuli and personal insights rather than professional behavior styles.

9. Personality Color Test

Similarity: Low

  • Focus: Uses color preferences to determine personality traits.
  • Methodology: Associates colors with specific personality traits.
  • Application: Personal insights, team building.
  • Difference: Informal, based on color psychology rather than systematic behavioral analysis.

10. Predictive Index Cognitive Assessment

Similarity: Very Low

  • Focus: Measures cognitive ability, including problem-solving and learning speed.
  • Methodology: Timed cognitive tests assessing various cognitive abilities.
  • Application: Employee selection, identifying cognitive potential.
  • Difference: Focuses on cognitive abilities rather than behavior styles or ethical behavior.

Summary:

  • Most Similar: DiSC Personality Test
  • Moderately Similar: MBTI, Enneagram, HIGH5 Test, Big 5, HEXACO
  • Less Similar: Berkeley Emotional Intelligence Quiz, “Who Am I” Visual DNA Test, Personality Color Test
  • Least Similar: Predictive Index Cognitive Assessment

The Integrity Solutions Behavior Style Assessments are unique in their strong focus on ethical behavior and integrity, which sets them apart from many other personality and cognitive assessments.

See Also